That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

To render the（）liable，the shipowners must show that the proximate cause of the detention or expense was trading to a river with a bar or to a port with a bar.

The importance of the distinction between a charter by demise and a charter party proper（）that under the former the master is the agent of the Charterer，not of the Shipowner.

The final inspection responsibility for seeing that a tank barge is provided with the required equipment and fittings in good and serviceable condition prior to loading cargo rests with the （）.

If the vessel is not discharged in the time stipulated in the charter-party，the Charterer renders（）liable to pay demurrage or damages for detention，as the case may be.

If the Charterer sends a vessel to an unsafe port，and she is damaged as a result，he will have to indemnify the（）.

If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

The Charterer is entitled to the benefit of the excepted perils during the transit of the goods from storing place to the actual place of loading，provided such transit substantially （）part of the operation of loading.

If the vessel does not arrive by the canceling date，and the Charterer（）expenses，these expenses can be claimed by him from the Shipowner where they are in the reasonable contemplation of the parties.

The cesser clause mainly purports to relieve（）from paying demurrage.